No comparable view
Group leadership cannot tell which plant carries the most risk, because each site is audited differently.
RI · Risk intelligence & benchmarking
Risk intelligence your board can act on.
Compliance checklists tell you whether a document exists. Our benchmark tells you whether the barrier works, how each facility compares with its peers, and which investment will remove the most risk.
Overview
What we do, and why it matters.
Boards, lenders and insurers need to compare risk across assets, and a pass-or-fail audit cannot do that. The Procyon 100-Point Industrial Benchmark turns verified site findings into a defensible score across five domains: process safety management, occupational health and safety, environmental and social performance, governance and assurance, and emergency preparedness.
Every point is tied to a requirement in a recognised standard and to evidence we check in the field. Scores are compared with sector peers, so a urea plant is measured against urea plants, and gaps are ranked by how much risk each rupee of remediation removes.
Portfolio score · 4 sites
The challenges
Where clients come to us.
Spend without priority
Remediation budgets go to the loudest findings, not the ones that reduce the most risk.
Evidence lenders question
Self-assessed scores do not satisfy lenders, insurers or regulators who want independent verification.
What we deliver
Services and deliverables.
Facility benchmarkA scored site assessment out of 100, with domain scores and a full evidence file.
Portfolio dashboardsSide-by-side scores for groups that run several plants, refreshed at each re-score.
Peer comparisonEach facility’s position against anonymised sector medians.
Remediation roadmapActions ranked by risk reduced per rupee, sequenced into a practical plan.
Our approach
How an engagement runs.
Document review
We review PSM, OHS and E&S documentation before the visit and plan the field checks around it.
Site verification
Principals walk down critical barriers and interview operators and contractors over three to five days.
Score and compare
Findings are scored independently by two principals, reconciled, and compared with sector peers.
Board read-out
We present results to leadership, deliver the full report, and re-score after twelve months.
Standards
Anchored in recognised frameworks
- CCPS Risk Based Process Safety
- ISO 45001
- IFC Performance Standards
- World Bank EHS Guidelines
- API RP 754
Sectors and clients
Who we work with
Multi-site industrial groups, fertilizer and petrochemical complexes, power portfolios, and the lenders and insurers that finance them.
Selected experience
Led by our principals
- Multi-facility safety and sustainability peer review across GCC industrial operators
- Sector-level performance data from the GPCA sustainability platform
- PSM baselining across fertilizer and petrochemical facilities
Questions
Frequently asked questions.
How is the benchmark different from an audit?
An audit checks compliance against a list and returns findings. The benchmark verifies whether barriers work in the field, weights findings by major-accident and financing risk, produces a comparable score, and ranks remediation by value. It is designed for decisions, not for filing.
Can the results be shared with lenders and insurers?
Yes. The evidence file and scoring method are documented so that lenders, insurers and regulators can review how each score was reached.
How often should a facility be re-benchmarked?
We recommend a re-score after twelve months, so leadership can see the effect of the remediation roadmap, and annually after that.
Related services
One integrated mandate.
See the risk before it rises
Speak with a principal about your project.
We scope the conversation to your sector, your project stage and the standards you answer to, with no obligation.